Subject: Re: C ჰეპატიტის ელექტრონულ მოდულთან დაკავშირებით მიშა ჯანიაშვილის კომენტარი
From: "Maia Lagvilava" <Lagvilava>
To: Shota Jamburidze
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 10:32:40 +0300

მადლობა

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 30, 2018, at 11:35 PM, Shota Jamburidze <[email-masked]> wrote:

საღამო მშვიდობის ქალბატონო მაია,

მიშა ჯანიაშვილის დავალებით გიგზავნით ქვემოთ მოცემულ ტექსტს.

პატივისცემით,

შოთა

I have got known with the document. Let me provide you some of our wishes and comments related to the issue.

I agree with the principle of dividing the electronic systems by modules, in order to ensuring parallel processes of the system developing, which helps to deliver final product faster.

Modules of commission, drug logistics, treatment and monitoring, outside systems’ integration modules should be relatively independent and are interconnected with data exchange means. For example, the modification of the drug
logistics module should not be caused by change of the treatment methods and schemes, and this module should be able to create a variety of "warehouses", which will take into account any level of decentralization. Also, should be able to present the medication
as “kits” of individual medicines to consider the treatment schemes.

In addition to these works, the development of the Commission Module may be conducted, as well as the treatment and monitoring development.

Under the decentralization, the optimal user structure: the functions and statuses of users, who are well aware of the data accumulating data, should be well defined. On the one hand, we do not think it is expedient to redistribute
the user functions of the level of physicians and laborers, because it increases the risk of accumulation of incorrect data. On the other hand, today's user structure requires detailing.

We can not agree with the idea that patient identification with their personal number in the screening module is problematic. We believe that the screening module can continue functioning with its current state, if a complete
service of data exchange between this module and the treatment modules will be created.

The reason of all problems is incorrectly described and inadequately detailed business processes. Thus, the first phase of the work is to prepare such document. Through this document, the volume of works, the possibilities of
their parallel execution and the completion of works will be outlined. Therefore, it is impossible to express specific opinions regarding the time frames presented today, but decentralization is risky without an well-functioning electronic system.

At the same time, it may be possible to develop the services needed to get information from external systems. The description of business processes will specify the list of such electronic systems and necessary data. In addition,
for example, the decision to create a more simple and compact new reporting model instead of the universal health care reporting module, can increase the level of system autonomy.

We totally agree with the requirement of transferring various electronic systems to the unified platform. We consider that with the selection of the platform, the perfect mapping should be made between the data, which ensures
that all data is transferred to one database, regardless of system and period of time, system collects specific data.

An analytical model, which will collect data through the data replication, should also be discussed. This model will be very likely to be created at the last stage, but the data, required for analytics, will have a decisive impact
on the creation of basic modules database.

All the actions, described above, needs a test environment. Resources for this can be found in the Ministry's infrastructure.